| Type |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
| ENFJ |
11.57% |
19.39% |
31.73% |
4.59% |
0.18% |
8.58% |
17.28% |
2.75% |
3.93% |
| ENFP |
2.18% |
15.74% |
14.98% |
14.52% |
0.21% |
4.69% |
38.63% |
2.44% |
6.60% |
| ENTJ |
15.08% |
4.03% |
26.13% |
2.35% |
0.61% |
5.77% |
17.21% |
27.13% |
1.69% |
| ENTP |
2.97% |
3.67% |
11.34% |
8.18% |
1.02% |
3.11% |
54.78% |
11.71% |
3.22% |
| ESFJ |
9.67% |
22.98% |
33.13% |
2.29% |
0.21% |
13.00% |
8.89% |
2.03% |
7.80% |
| ESFP |
4.05% |
17.57% |
20.41% |
5.64% |
0.23% |
7.69% |
29.17% |
4.10% |
11.14% |
| ESTJ |
19.51% |
6.17% |
31.81% |
0.89% |
0.45% |
9.89% |
10.02% |
16.60% |
4.65% |
| ESTP |
4.63% |
5.40% |
23.39% |
2.74% |
0.49% |
4.77% |
39.14% |
13.54% |
5.89% |
| INFJ |
16.00% |
15.39% |
2.77% |
16.65% |
1.73% |
20.60% |
4.65% |
1.63% |
20.58% |
| INFP |
2.96% |
11.96% |
1.48% |
39.07% |
1.19% |
10.24% |
5.41% |
1.03% |
26.68% |
| INTJ |
26.97% |
2.96% |
2.60% |
8.38% |
17.12% |
15.14% |
5.23% |
13.28% |
8.33% |
| INTP |
6.06% |
3.70% |
1.51% |
21.97% |
22.51% |
8.50% |
10.62% |
4.82% |
20.30% |
| ISFJ |
12.85% |
19.27% |
2.87% |
3.92% |
0.49% |
27.44% |
1.79% |
1.35% |
30.01% |
| ISFP |
2.39% |
12.60% |
2.13% |
15.07% |
0.80% |
14.39% |
4.84% |
1.79% |
46.01% |
| ISTJ |
28.50% |
6.22% |
3.94% |
2.65% |
3.73% |
27.23% |
2.16% |
6.38% |
19.19% |
| ISTP |
5.89% |
4.84% |
2.88% |
7.59% |
10.63% |
11.93% |
8.84% |
8.34% |
39.05% |
FAQ
Are all MBTI / Enneagram combinations possible?
In theory, yes—because the two systems are complementary. In practice, however, some combinations
are far more common than others, as certain cognitive-function patterns naturally align with
specific Enneagram types.
For example, 54.78% of ENTPs are
Type 7 (the Epicurean)—roughly one out of every two ENTPs.
This alignment makes sense: the ENTP’s dominant cognitive functions (extraverted intuition and
introverted thinking) tend to produce a profile that is highly oriented toward exploring possibilities
in the external world.
What’s the difference between MBTI and the Enneagram?
The MBTI® assessment (developed in the 1940s and owned by a private company) is based on
Carl Jung’s cognitive functions.
It describes how people tend—by preference or habit—to perceive information and make decisions.
The Enneagram, which is over a thousand years old and has no single confirmed origin, evolved through
the work of many contributors—most notably Don Richard Riso in the 1970s and psychiatrist
Claudio Naranjo from the 1980s onward. It focuses on deeper motivational drivers by describing
a compulsive psychological pattern. Each Enneagram type reflects a core pattern a person may
unconsciously revolve around throughout much of their life.
In short, MBTI primarily explains the how of behavior (cognitive preferences),
while the Enneagram focuses on the why (motivations, fears, and desires).
Used together, the two systems are highly complementary.
How useful is the Enneagram for personal growth?
The Enneagram offers concrete insight into the deeper core of personality, including motivations,
fears, desires, avoidance patterns, and defense mechanisms. It also helps assess internal balance:
two people with the same Enneagram type can look very different depending on their level of
psychological health and how effectively they manage
the core compulsion of their type.