MBTI / Enneagram Correlation: Study of 203,441 People (2024)
The three tables below were compiled from over 203,441 results of participants who took the Enneagram test on this website and provided their MBTI type.
All these results were deemed “sufficiently reliable” by our system (i.e., not borderline results and with a sufficiently high score in the main type), to ensure that the statistics are as accurate as possible.
Correlation Between MBTI and Enneagram Types
The table below shows the percentage concentration of Enneagram types within each MBTI type. For example, 6.48% of ENFJs are Type 1, and 36.84% of ENFJs are Type 3. It should be interpreted this way.
| Type |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
| ENFJ |
6.48% |
17.96% |
36.84% |
9.89% |
0.56% |
4.94% |
10.97% |
7.39% |
4.97% |
| ENFP |
1.49% |
16.37% |
15.18% |
23.74% |
0.41% |
2.49% |
29.19% |
4.79% |
6.34% |
| ENTJ |
8.34% |
2.99% |
28.26% |
3.95% |
2.01% |
3.09% |
8.49% |
41.21% |
1.65% |
| ENTP |
1.86% |
3.13% |
13.38% |
13.97% |
2.22% |
2.06% |
37.75% |
22.82% |
2.81% |
| ESFJ |
5.38% |
24.12% |
37.91% |
4.19% |
0.23% |
8.87% |
6.81% |
4.45% |
8.04% |
| ESFP |
1.84% |
16.09% |
23.73% |
9.26% |
0.69% |
4.60% |
30.05% |
6.39% |
7.34% |
| ESTJ |
13.81% |
5.65% |
37.19% |
1.64% |
1.06% |
6.92% |
5.65% |
24.12% |
3.97% |
| ESTP |
1.54% |
3.81% |
23.12% |
5.86% |
1.18% |
2.36% |
39.78% |
18.30% |
4.04% |
| INFJ |
10.57% |
19.32% |
3.02% |
21.14% |
5.78% |
16.06% |
3.05% |
3.11% |
17.96% |
| INFP |
2.18% |
13.60% |
1.32% |
45.09% |
3.09% |
8.43% |
4.90% |
1.76% |
19.61% |
| INTJ |
13.07% |
2.26% |
2.38% |
9.27% |
40.09% |
9.65% |
2.44% |
15.08% |
5.74% |
| INTP |
3.64% |
2.79% |
1.37% |
23.70% |
37.53% |
7.41% |
6.50% |
6.51% |
10.54% |
| ISFJ |
8.79% |
23.48% |
3.28% |
5.79% |
2.79% |
26.88% |
1.93% |
2.13% |
24.94% |
| ISFP |
2.09% |
14.83% |
2.03% |
21.45% |
3.30% |
14.68% |
6.97% |
2.18% |
32.47% |
| ISTJ |
21.37% |
5.72% |
4.18% |
3.57% |
16.23% |
21.91% |
2.03% |
9.84% |
15.15% |
| ISTP |
3.57% |
3.70% |
2.41% |
10.83% |
30.64% |
11.10% |
9.08% |
7.85% |
20.92% |
We can see that there is indeed a correlation between MBTI types and Enneagram types, but it’s not absolute. The summary further down the page lists the case-by-case correlation between each MBTI type and the Enneagram types.
Correlation Between Enneagram Types and Dichotomous Preferences
The table below shows the concentration of dichotomous preferences within each Enneagram type. For example, 84.26% of Type 2s primarily judge using their feelings ("F" for "Feeling"), and 60.77% of Type 4s are introverts ("I" for "Introversion"). It should be interpreted this way.
| Lettre |
E |
I |
S |
N |
F |
T |
P |
J |
| 1 |
35.49% |
64.51% |
53.54% |
46.46% |
40.97% |
59.03% |
17.96% |
82.04% |
| 2 |
50.66% |
49.34% |
53.15% |
46.85% |
84.26% |
15.74% |
42.93% |
57.07% |
| 3 |
91.17% |
8.83% |
57.35% |
42.65% |
52.14% |
47.86% |
36.74% |
63.26% |
| 4 |
36.06% |
63.94% |
30.01% |
69.99% |
66.63% |
33.37% |
69.15% |
30.85% |
| 5 |
5.99% |
94.01% |
43.27% |
56.73% |
10.77% |
89.23% |
46.66% |
53.34% |
| 6 |
22.09% |
77.91% |
63.40% |
36.60% |
57.96% |
42.04% |
35.08% |
64.92% |
| 7 |
84.33% |
15.67% |
49.32% |
50.68% |
43.68% |
56.32% |
78.64% |
21.36% |
| 8 |
73.31% |
26.69% |
44.88% |
55.12% |
17.69% |
82.31% |
39.32% |
60.68% |
| 9 |
21.66% |
78.34% |
63.01% |
36.99% |
66.52% |
33.48% |
54.48% |
45.52% |
It’s interesting to note that each type does have at least one fairly strong dichotomous preference. However, we must not overlook minorities, which can often be sizable—“30%” represents 300 people out of 1,000, which is still very significant. Nevertheless, it’s enlightening to observe general tendencies. For instance:
- Type 1s (“the Perfectionists”) are predominantly Judgers (“J” at 82.04%), preferring to process (organize, structure) information rather than seek it (explore, listen).
- Type 2s (“the Altruists”) are largely Feelers (“F” at 84.26%), preferring to make decisions based on their feelings (“I like it” / “I don’t like it”) rather than purely on logic (“it’s true” / “it’s false”).
- Type 3s (“the Chameleons”) are mostly Extroverts (“E” at 91.17%), who recharge by interacting with others, making new acquaintances, and staying active (instead of remaining at home).
- Type 4s (“the Artists”) are mainly Intuitives (“N” at 69.99%) and Perceivers (“P” at 69.15%), often drawn to abstract and theoretical topics rather than concrete, current issues. Nonetheless, a significant proportion of Type 4s are Sensors (“S” at 30.01%) or Judgers (“J” at 30.01%).
- Type 5s (“the Observers”) are predominantly Introverts (“I” at 94.01%), who recharge by spending time alone (often at home) or with one close person, preferring to make decisions with their reason ("T" at 89.23%) rather than their feelings.
- Type 6s (“the Loyalists”) are also mostly Introverts (“I” at 77.91%).
- Type 7s (“the Adventurers”) are largely Extroverts (“E” at 84.33%), favoring going out, being on the move (“E”), improvising, exploring, and seeking adventure (“P” at 78.64%) over maintaining a more orderly approach (“J”).
- Type 8s (“the Leaders”) are mostly Thinkers (“T” at 82.31%), relying more on logic than emotion, and to a lesser extent are also Extroverts (“E” at 73.31%).
- Type 9s (“the Peacemakers”) are mostly Introverts (“I” at 78.34%).
Correlation Between Enneagram Types and Jung’s Cognitive Functions
The table below shows the concentration of Jungian cognitive functions (whether dominant or auxiliary) within each Enneagram type. For instance, 46.54% of Type 1s have “Si” (Introverted Sensing) as either their dominant or auxiliary function.
| Fonction |
Se |
Si |
Ne |
Ni |
Fe |
Fi |
Te |
Ti |
| 1 |
9.06% |
46.54% |
8.57% |
37.79% |
32.67% |
6.99% |
47.84% |
10.53% |
| 2 |
21.21% |
35.36% |
21.44% |
26.53% |
46.48% |
34.29% |
7.40% |
7.30% |
| 3 |
22.04% |
38.25% |
16.25% |
28.08% |
32.32% |
17.56% |
27.89% |
17.61% |
| 4 |
20.07% |
6.28% |
44.06% |
20.21% |
23.26% |
50.22% |
10.13% |
25.78% |
| 5 |
25.28% |
12.47% |
23.46% |
31.38% |
7.65% |
4.34% |
50.20% |
45.21% |
| 6 |
23.80% |
45.68% |
13.88% |
25.56% |
35.36% |
17.67% |
23.54% |
14.51% |
| 7 |
39.53% |
8.26% |
39.64% |
11.45% |
11.75% |
33.60% |
9.60% |
46.17% |
| 8 |
19.55% |
22.10% |
19.94% |
32.98% |
10.39% |
7.83% |
54.23% |
32.98% |
| 9 |
38.26% |
29.75% |
21.62% |
18.93% |
29.54% |
32.07% |
11.61% |
18.22% |
Thus, even though there are strong correlations—such as 54.23% of Type 8s having “Te” (Extraverted Thinking) in a dominant or auxiliary position—there is no overwhelming majority for any single cognitive function (dominant or auxiliary) within a given Enneagram type. This underscores both the complementarity of the MBTI and Enneagram systems and the broad range of possible combinations.
The summary below helps you find MBTI types and their correlation rates with Enneagram types on a case-by-case basis.
Summary
MBTI Types and Their Enneagram Correlations
The Organizers (ExxJ)
- ENFJ: Chameleon (36.84%) or Altruist (17.96%)?
- ENTJ: Leader (41.21%) or Chameleon (28.26%)?
- ESFJ: Chameleon (37.91%) or Altruist (24.12%)?
- ESTJ: Chameleon (37.19%) or Leader (24.12%)?
The Adventurers (ExxP)
- ENFP: Adventurer (29.19%) or Artist (23.74%)?
- ENTP: Adventurer (37.75%) or Challenger (22.82%)?
- ESFP: Adventurer (30.05%) or Chameleon (23.73%)?
- ESTP: Adventurer (39.78%), Chameleon (23.12%), or Challenger (18.30%)?
The Empathetic Types (IxFx)
- INFJ: Artist (21.14%), Peacemaker (17.96%), or Altruist (19.32%)?
- INFP: Artist (45.09%) or Peacemaker (19.61%)?
- ISFJ: Loyalist (26.88%), Peacemaker (24.94%), or Altruist (23.48%)?
- ISFP: Peacemaker (32.47%), Artist (21.45%), or Loyalist (14.83%)?
The Analysts (IxTx)
- INTJ: Observer (40.09%), Leader (15.08%), or Perfectionist (13.07%)?
- INTP: Observer (37.53%) or Artist (23.70%)?
- ISTJ: Loyalist (21.91%), Perfectionist (21.37%), or Observer (16.23%)?
- ISTP: Observer (30.64%) or Peacemaker (20.92%)?
FAQ
MBTI Types and Their Enneagram Correlations
The Organizers (ExxJ)
ENFJ: Chameleon (36.84%) or Altruist (17.96%)?
Many ENFJs are Type 3 Chameleons (36.84%), drawn to success and possessing strong social skills. They are highly adept at coaching others, thanks to their capacity to understand people intuitively (Extraverted Feeling / Introverted Intuition) and their drive for achievement (Type 3). Other ENFJs are Type 2 Altruists (17.96%), even more detached from themselves and focused on others.
Sometimes ENFJs are Type 7 Adventurers (10.97%), Type 4 Artists (9.89%), or Type 8 Leaders (7.39%). More rarely, they’re Type 1 Perfectionists (6.48%) or Type 6 Loyalists (4.94%). ENFJs of Type 5 (0.56%) are extremely rare.
ENTJ: Leader (41.21%) or Chameleon (28.26%)?
Many ENTJs are Type 8 Leaders (41.21%), strongly focused on independence, control, and power (Type 8), coupled with extensive planning and strategy skills (Extraverted Thinking / Introverted Intuition). Another large group of ENTJs are Type 3 Chameleons (28.26%), displaying a more flexible, socially oriented personality (less focus on “control,” more concern for image) compared to Type 8 but still highly ambitious (Type 3’s drive for success) and consistently strategic (Extraverted Thinking / Introverted Intuition).
Less commonly, ENTJs may be Type 7 Adventurers (8.49%) or Type 1 Perfectionists (8.34%). ENTJs of Type 4 (3.95%), Type 2 (2.99%), Type 5 (2.01%), or Type 9 (1.65%) are rare.
ESFJ: Chameleon (37.91%) or Altruist (24.12%)?
Many ESFJs are Type 3 Chameleons (37.91%), drawn to success and with strong social skills. They greatly value experience, often learning from others (Extraverted Feeling / Introverted Sensing) to better achieve their goals, and they also enjoy uplifting others with their own experiences (Type 3). A significant number of ESFJs are Type 2 Altruists (24.12%), even more self-effacing and devoted to helping others.
Sometimes ESFJs are Type 6 Loyalists (8.87%) or Type 7 Adventurers (6.81%). ESFJs of Type 1 (5.38%), Type 4 (4.19%), Type 8 (4.45%), or Type 5 (0.23%) are rare.
ESTJ: Chameleon (37.19%) or Leader (24.12%)?
A large share of ESTJs are Type 3 Chameleons (37.19%), drawn to success and wielding strong tactical and strategic skills (Extraverted Thinking / Introverted Sensing) to achieve their goals. With an inherently high-performance, disciplined, methodical, and objective style (Extraverted Thinking / Introverted Sensing), these ESTJs leverage all those strengths to reach their ambitions, usually guided by their own definition of "success" and what might earn them admiration (Type 3). Many other ESTJs are Type 8 Leaders (24.12%), more attuned to autonomy and power than to success, somewhat rebellious (influenced by Type 8), and a bit less socially oriented than Type 3.
Some ESTJs are Type 1 principled perfectionists (13.81%). ESTJs of Type 6 (6.92%), Type 7 (5.65%), Type 2 (5.65%), Type 9 (3.97%), Type 4 (1.64%), and Type 5 (1.06%) are less common.
The Adventurers (ExxP)
ENFP: Adventurer (29.19%) or Artist (23.74%)?
Many ENFPs are Type 7 Adventurers (29.19%), strongly attracted to new experiences, fun projects, and ever-changing stimulation. They have abundant energy (Type 7) and a constant flow of ideas (Extraverted Intuition), especially when those ideas align with their values (Introverted Feeling). Other ENFPs are Type 4 Artists (23.74%), often leaning more toward ambiversion (due to strong Introverted Feeling), thereby channeling their Extraverted Intuition into ideas/art/the inner world more than the typical Type 7 might. Even so, both remain sensitive to both external and internal activities—just with slightly different emphases.
Sometimes ENFPs are Type 2 Altruists (16.37%), more selfless and inclined to focus on others, or Type 3 Chameleons (15.18%), more attuned to what leads them to success. More rarely, they could be Type 9 Peacemakers (6.34%) or Type 8 Challengers (4.79%). ENFPs of Type 6 (2.49%), Type 1 (1.49%), or Type 5 (0.41%) are rare.
ENTP: Adventurer (37.75%) or Challenger (22.82%)?
Many ENTPs are Type 7 Adventurers (37.75%), highly driven by exploration of new experiences (Extraverted Intuition / Introverted Thinking) and motivated by enjoyment or stimulation (Type 7). They often struggle with self-discipline, as this pairing (ENTP / Type 7) is innately drawn to variety and can lack regulation. They are also typically quite intellectual (thanks to Extraverted Intuition) and enjoy long, stimulating debates. Another substantial group of ENTPs are Type 8 Challengers (22.82%), balanced out by Type 8’s desire for control, which makes them more cautious before jumping in and also more intense (Type 7 tends to avoid negative emotions, whereas Type 8 is more inclined to confront them).
Sometimes ENTPs are Type 4 Artists (13.97%) or Type 3 Chameleons (13.38%). ENTPs of Type 2 (3.13%), Type 5 (2.22%), Type 6 (2.06%), or Type 9 (2.81%) are rare.
ESFP: Adventurer (30.05%) or Chameleon (23.73%)?
A large proportion of ESFPs are Type 7 Adventurers (30.05%), especially attuned to the external world in the here and now (Extraverted Sensing / Introverted Feeling), constantly on the lookout for entertaining or stimulating new experiences to enjoy. They scan their surroundings for opportunities, instinctively recognizing new activities they love immersing themselves in for continued fulfillment. Equally, many ESFPs are Type 3 Chameleons (23.73%), more image-conscious and tied to the idea of success (which they like to embody), with a high capacity for adaptation (combining two of the most adaptable types in MBTI and Enneagram)—the ultimate performer.
Other ESFPs are Type 2 Altruists (16.09%) or Type 4 Artists (9.26%). ESFPs of Type 9 (7.34%), Type 8 (6.39%), Type 6 (4.60%), Type 1 (1.84%), or Type 5 (0.69%) are rarer.
ESTP: Adventurer (39.78%), Chameleon (23.12%), or Challenger (18.30%)?
Many ESTPs are Type 7 Adventurers (39.78%), ceaselessly exploring their environment in the present moment with a logical perspective (Introverted Thinking / Extraverted Sensing) in search of engaging, fun, or satisfying experiences. Others are Type 3 Chameleons (23.12%), more oriented toward the success they want to personify. ESTP Challengers (Type 8 at 18.30%) are more driven by control and power.
ESTPs of Type 1 (1.54%), Type 2 (3.81%), Type 4 (5.86%), Type 5 (1.18%), Type 6 (2.36%), and Type 9 (4.04%) are less common.
The Empathetic Types (IxFx)
INFJ: Artist (21.14%), Peacemaker (17.96%), or Altruist (19.32%)?
Many INFJs are Type 4 Artists (21.14%), particularly in touch with their inner world and emotional depth (Introverted Intuition / Extraverted Feeling), giving them a heightened sensitivity to aesthetics, creativity, and introspection (Type 4). Others are Type 2 Altruists (19.32%), focusing on giving and helping (with more outwardly directed empathy), or Type 9 Peacemakers (17.96%), emphasizing harmony, calm, and avoiding conflict.
Sometimes INFJs are Type 1 Perfectionists (10.57%), Type 3 Chameleons (3.02%), or Type 5 Observers (5.78%). INFJs of Type 6 (16.06%), Type 7 (3.05%), or Type 8 (3.11%) are less common.
INFP: Artist (45.09%) or Peacemaker (19.61%)?
A large number of INFPs are Type 4 Artists (45.09%), with strong Introverted Feeling / Extraverted Intuition, leading them to deep introspection, a quest for identity, and a drive for unique self-expression. Others are Type 9 Peacemakers (19.61%), prioritizing harmony and unity, often avoiding conflicts to maintain inner peace.
Sometimes INFPs are Type 2 Altruists (13.60%), Type 6 Loyalists (8.43%), or Type 5 Observers (3.09%). INFPs of Type 1 (2.18%), Type 3 (1.32%), Type 7 (4.90%), and Type 8 (1.76%) are rarer.
ISFJ: Loyalist (26.88%), Peacemaker (24.94%), or Altruist (23.48%)?
Many ISFJs are Type 6 Loyalists (26.88%), strongly inclined toward stability, responsibility, and reliability (Introverted Sensing / Extraverted Feeling). A significant group of ISFJs are Type 9 Peacemakers (24.94%), seeking harmony and tranquility, and some are Type 2 Altruists (23.48%), devoted to caring for others.
Sometimes ISFJs are Type 1 Perfectionists (8.79%), Type 4 Artists (5.79%), or Type 3 Chameleons (3.28%). ISFJs of Type 5 (2.79%), Type 8 (2.13%), or Type 7 (1.93%) are less common.
ISFP: Peacemaker (32.47%), Artist (21.45%), or Loyalist (14.68%)?
A large number of ISFPs are Type 9 Peacemakers (32.47%), valuing calm, harmony, and personal authenticity (Introverted Feeling / Extraverted Sensing), who prefer avoiding conflict. Others are Type 4 Artists (21.45%), with a keener focus on expressing their individuality, creativity, and emotions. Some ISFPs are Type 6 Loyalists (14.68%), more concerned with security and loyalty. Or Type 2 Altruists (14.83%), more devoted to helping others.
Sometimes ISFPs are Type 7 Adventurers (6.97%). ISFPs of Type 3 (2.03%), Type 1 (2.09%), Type 5 (3.30%), and Type 8 (2.18%) are less frequent.
The Analysts (IxTx)
INTJ: Observer (40.09%), Leader (15.08%), or Perfectionist (13.07%)?
Many INTJs are Type 5 Observers (40.09%), driven by knowledge, analysis, and independence (Introverted Intuition / Extraverted Thinking). Others are Type 8 Leaders (15.08%), more oriented toward autonomy and strategic power, or Type 1 Perfectionists (13.07%), more focused on doing things "the right way" and upholding principles.
Sometimes INTJs are Type 6 Loyalists (9.65%), or Type 4 Artists (9.27%). INTJs of Type 9 (5.74%), Type 7 (2.44%), Type 3 (2.38%), or Type 2 (2.26%) are quite rare.
INTP: Observer (37.53%) or Artist (23.70%)?
Many INTPs are Type 5 Observers (37.53%), highly analytical, logical, and often intellectually curious (Introverted Thinking / Extraverted Intuition). Others are Type 4 Artists (23.70%), leaning more into individuality and creativity, often bringing an imaginative and original perspective to their analyses.
Sometimes INTPs are Type 9 Peacemakers (10.54%), Type 6 Loyalists (7.41%), or Type 7 Adventurers (6.50%). INTPs of Type 1 (3.64%), Type 2 (2.79%), Type 3 (1.37%), or Type 8 (6.51%) are less common.
ISTJ: Loyalist (21.91%), Perfectionist (21.37%), or Observer (16.23%)?
A substantial number of ISTJs are Type 6 Loyalists (21.91%), valuing duty, responsibility, and stability (Introverted Sensing / Extraverted Thinking). Others are Type 1 Perfectionists (21.37%), focusing on order, rules, and integrity, or Type 5 Observers (16.23%), more analytical and often drawn to data and systems.
Sometimes ISTJs are Type 9 Peacemakers (15.15%), Type 8 Leaders (8.61%), or Type 3 Chameleons (7.09%). ISTJs of Type 2 (5.72%), Type 4 (3.56%), or Type 7 (2.03%) are less common.
ISTP: Observer (30.64%) or Peacemaker (20.92%)?
Many ISTPs are Type 5 Observers (30.64%), highly autonomous, analytical, and inclined to learn through practical experimentation (Introverted Thinking / Extraverted Sensing). Others are Type 9 Peacemakers (20.92%), more attuned to calm and harmony, with less urgency for conflict or control.
Sometimes ISTPs are Type 6 Loyalists (11.10%), Type 4 Artists (10.83%), or Type 7 Adventurers (9.08%). ISTPs of Type 8 (7.85%), Type 2 (3.70%), Type 1 (3.57%), or Type 3 (2.41%) are more unusual.
FAQ
What’s the difference between MBTI and the Enneagram?
The MBTI® test (created in the 1940s and owned by a private company) is inspired by Carl Jung’s cognitive functions. It provides insight into how a person prefers, by nature, to perceive and process information.
The Enneagram (which has existed for over a millennium—no one knows exactly when it originated—and has evolved over time through various contributions, such as Don Richard Riso in the 1970s or psychiatrist Claudio Naranjo starting in the 1980s) provides insights into a person’s core drivers through the concept of a “compulsive circle.” Each Enneagram type revolves around a compulsion that could potentially guide someone’s behavior throughout their life.
While MBTI focuses more on the “how” of behavior (through cognitive function preferences), the Enneagram explores the “why” (desires, fears, motivations). Both tests are complementary.
Is every MBTI/Enneagram combination possible?
In theory, yes—since the tests are complementary. However, some combinations are much more common than others because certain cognitive functions pair more naturally with specific Enneagram types.
For example, 45.09% of INFPs are Type 4 (nearly half!). This makes sense because an INFP’s dominant functions (introverted feeling and extraverted intuition) give them a sensitive, dreamy, and strongly values-driven profile—very much in line with Type 4 (the Artist), who is highly self-focused and tends to have a large imaginative world.
Only 1.32% of INFPs are Type 3 (the “chameleons”), which also makes sense, given that Type 3 is extremely success-oriented and externally focused. People of this type often have well-developed extraverted thinking (for example, ESTJs or ENTJs, who use it as their primary function and are 37.19% and 28.26% Type 3, respectively). For INFPs, extraverted thinking is an inferior function, so it is used less frequently—one likely reason they’re less inclined to combine with this Enneagram type.
Can someone’s MBTI or Enneagram type change over time?
Yes, it’s possible—but it’s quite rare, as a person’s personality (which goes well beyond the scope of both the MBTI and the Enneagram) generally settles into familiar patterns and becomes more anchored in its habits.
However, throughout life, significant external experiences or strong internal drives for specific change can shift aspects of someone’s personality. Since personality can be quite malleable in principle, it’s possible that one’s MBTI or Enneagram type may evolve. If that occurs, it usually won’t flip into something radically opposite, but instead shift in nuances (e.g., INTJ → ENTJ or INFP → ISFP), if it happens at all.
Can someone have multiple MBTI or Enneagram types?
We already “have” all the MBTI types in the sense that we possess all cognitive functions. The MBTI type we identify with represents the structure of functions we use most comfortably and frequently. It’s more accurate to call this our “main MBTI type,” without excluding the others.
Regarding the Enneagram, for most people, the answer is no—and that’s actually a relief. An Enneagram type is not just a personality type but rather a “compulsive circle.” Managing even one can be challenging—let alone several. If it did happen, it would likely be during a prolonged “imbalance,” where compulsions from other types might add to the base type.
On the other hand, it’s entirely possible to exhibit personality traits of multiple Enneagram types, and this is very common. We can all develop traits from all nine Enneagram types without being those types. This is especially true when we are “in harmony with ourselves,” thus more fully in control of our own behavior.
Why does the Enneagram matter for personal development?
The Enneagram provides concrete answers about the core of our personality: our motivations, fears, desires, avoidance compulsions, and defense mechanisms. It also helps us gauge our level of harmony or imbalance. Two people of the same Enneagram type can differ widely based on how harmonious they are with themselves and how they manage the compulsion that defines their type.
Where can I take a reliable Enneagram test?
You can take the same Enneagram test used by participants in our study by clicking on the button below. About 80% of users who rated their results believe this test accurately identified their main Enneagram type.